Is the merchant of Venice Anti-Semitic ?

In this essay I will explore the question ‘is the merchant of Venice anti-Semitic ?’. Anti-semitisim is the hostility and discrimination towards Jews. There were many forms of discrimination towards Jews , a prime example of this was when they were segregated into the ghetto, away from all the other Christians as Jews were seen as a threat to them, the origin of the word ‘Ghetto’ comes from 2 different places , the first from the Italian word ‘geto’ which means to cast off. Also the other italian word ‘barghetto’ which means small community. In 1611 a man called  Thomas Corbat combined the two words and created the word ghetto. As the Jews were parted into this area they were also restricted from working in certain jobs , but on the contrary they had  jobs to do with the Jewish or Venetian stock exchange also know as The Rialto which was made as stereotype thorough out this period . Jews were often stigmatised and lives made hard as they were treated inhumanly like , they were used as a way of getting money. Throughout my essay I will asses the character who made these points take effect.

One way in which discrimination is shown in the merchant of Venice is in Shylock’s ” I am a Jew. Hath not a Jew eyes? hath not a Jew hands, organs, dimensions, senses, affections, passions?” speech where he urges us the audience to understand that Jews and Christians share a common humanity.Shylock also exposes the hypocrisy of the Christian characters who are always talking about Christian love and mercy,  but then go out of their way to put down and divide , Shylock because he’s Jewish and different. From this I can infer that Shylock is saying that although he is a Jew , he is still a human just like a Christian. But a counterpoint to this speech that is often said by many, is that what is the reason for Shakespeare adding this speech to the play if he wanted Shylock to be seen as a villain and not a hero , this is because in this speech Shylock is expressing his feelings that he hates the way Jews are put down and discriminated , compared to Christians , this highly upsets him , So can Shylock be perceived as a villain throughout the whole play or only in certain moments of the play ?

In another area of the merchant of Venice , Anti-Semitism is shown again where Shylock is disgustingly mocked by Antonio in (1.3.121-122; 135-141)SHYLOCK :You call me misbeliever, cutthroat dog,And spet upon my Jewish gaberdine,’Fair sir, you spet on me on Wednesday last,You spurned me such a day; another time You called me dog; and for these courtesies I’ll lend you thus much moneys’?
ANTONIO : I am as like to call thee so again, 
To spit on thee again, to spurn thee too. In this part of the play Shylock wholeheartedly proclaimed the way Antonio has treated like a piece of rubbish , then Antonio shows no sign of sympathy, cold-hearted and is unapologetic , therefore insists that his racist behaviour towards Shylock will never change , not even if he lends him money. From this passage in the play I can infer that Shylock is clearly discriminated by Antonio due to his actions of hatred towards him , once for again for the main reason of ‘HE IS A JEW’. Antonio then goes to say that his ways towards Shylock will not change, even if he is given money by Shylock. But on the other-hand certain people may say that Antonio did this out of his pure jealousy for Shylock due to his riches, but in my opinion he only did this because he is Jew therefore Antonio will not respect him. I strongly wonder if Antonio’s abuse towards Shylock is to blame for his possible downfall later on in the play…

In my opinion Anti-Semitism is shown in an area where, Shylock shows the justice system is corrupt , because throughout the play , people such as Antonio and his associates, as well as other Christians characters in the play constantly try to accuse Shylock of being evil, barbarous and cold-hearted , due to the fact of wanting Antonio’s Flesh, But Shylock declared and proclaimed in Act 4, Scene 1 “You have among you many a purchased slave, which , like your asses and your dogs and mules, you us in object and in slavish parts because you bought them.” Here Shylock is highlighting the non-fictional point of the Christians in Venice being involved in the slave trade in the 1500s. This is where ” Venice had established a thriving slave trade, buying in Italy, amongst other places, and selling to the Moors in Northern Africa, the Venetians began to sell Slavs and other Eastern European non-Christian slaves in greater numbers.” From this Shylock is showing us the audience , that the Christians talk about having love and mercy but were largely involved in a very evil act of slavery. The Christians and Venetian state are discriminating him by saying he is a bad person, but they make there money from slavery , treat Jews like animals and are corrupt , so if Shylock was in Antonio’s situation a pound of flesh would be taken from him, So in this case Shylock is not wrong for wanting is bond.

In conclusion to my essay , I think the merchant of venice is an anti-semitic play due to the points I have highlighted above , where Shylock countless times is brought down by the Christians and mocked because he is Jew. I also think that the Christians are to blame for Shylock’s villainy throughout the play, I think this turned out to be costly for the Christians as there comes a point where Shylock’s understanding and Sympathy is needed but will be over-shone by his revengeful and villainy thoughts.

By Kelvin

References to : Cambridge School Shakespeare Merchant of Venice

 

 

 

 

1 Comment

  1. Hi Kelvin,

    Well done for writing this!

    Some feedback:

    1) In your first paragraph, please make clear that you are talking about the historical experience of Jews in Venice in 1596. And then you need to talk about what you are going to write about in your essay

    2) Great argument in the second paragraph, but you need to tidy up the expression. In fact, please look at your expression throughout the essay!

    3) Shorten the length of your quotes throughout your piece. You only need to include the relevant parts.

    4) Final thing to do here, Kelvin, would be to analyse language. Please do the corrections above and then speak to me about this

    Mr O’B

Give Feedback